Why the study?
Does complementary invasive imaging improve the diagnostic accuracy of culprit lesion detection in patients with NSTE-ACS and MVD?
Does complementary invasive imaging improve the diagnostic accuracy of culprit lesion detection in patients with NSTE-ACS and MVD?
Complementary invasive imaging is valuable for identifying the culprit lesion in NSTE-ACS patients with multivessel disease when coronary angiography is ambiguous.
The culprit lesion appeared unclear by coronary angiography in >10% of patients with NSTE-ACS and MVD. Complementary invasive imaging substantially enhanced the diagnostic accuracy of culprit lesion detection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Balbi et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: