Single-centre study reveals anatomical improvement and treatment burden reduction in resistant nAMD patients.
Purpose: To evaluate anatomical, functional, and treatment burden outcomes of Faricimab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients with persistent disease activity despite prior anti-VEGF therapy. Patients and Methods: Single-centre retrospective study of 67 eyes switched to Faricimab (November 2022–December 2024). This cohort was unable to be extended beyond 4– 6-week intervals on existing anti-VEGF therapy. All patients received three monthly loading doses followed by treat-and-extend regimen. Primary outcomes: central macular thickness (CMT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), macular dryness over eight injections, and treatment interval extension. Results: The cohort had received mean 33 (range 10– 78) prior anti-VEGF. Baseline mean BCVA was 0.42 logMAR (SD ± 0.28) and mean CMT was 244.5 μm (SD ± 62.2). Statistically significant CMT reduction occurred by injection 8 (− 16.9 μm, p=0.0084). Complete macular dryness peaked by the time of third injection (43.3%) then declined to 32.8% at injection 8 (p=0.0089). Visual acuity remained unchanged (p=0.6043) with no correlation to CMT change (p=0.172). Treatment interval extension was achieved in 46.3% of patients (p=0.002). Dryness at injection 3 after switching to Faricimab did not predict treatment extension (p=0.217). Two patients (0.36% of total injections, 2/548) developed sterile intraocular inflammation requiring discontinuation. Conclusion: Faricimab switching achieves statistically significant but modest anatomical improvement in heavily pretreated nAMD with meaningful treatment burden reduction in 46.3% of eyes. Our analysis revealed treatment burden did not indicate the potential for treatment interval extension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stewart et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: