PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 28, 2026Dermatologic Surgery2 citations

Analysis of US Food and Drug Administration Data on Radiofrequency Microneedling Device Complications

View Full Paper
MCMargaret M. ChouBMBridget MyersMAMathew M. Avram

Key Points

  • To analyze adverse events associated with radiofrequency microneedling devices reported to the US FDA MAUDE database.
  • Retrospective review of FDA MAUDE reports from January 2013 to October 2025
  • Analysis focused on treatment locations and adverse outcomes
  • Categorization of narrative descriptions into clinically relevant events
  • Descriptive statistics summarized complication frequencies and anatomical sites
  • 114 reports with 224 events were identified
  • Most frequent complications included textural changes (25.0%), pigmentary alteration (18.3%), and fat loss (11.6%)
  • Other frequent complications were inflammatory reactions (8.0%), burns (6.3%), and pain (5.4%)
  • The face, neck, and abdomen were the most treated anatomic regions

Abstract

BACKGROUND Radiofrequency microneedling (RFMN) is increasingly used for rejuvenation, acne scars, and tightening. Although marketed as minimally invasive, lasting adverse effects have been reported. Postmarketing surveillance provides insight into real-world safety. OBJECTIVE To characterize adverse events associated with RFMN devices reported to the US FDA MAUDE database, emphasizing the frequency and spectrum of complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review of FDA MAUDE reports from January 2013 to October 2025 was conducted. Entries involving RFMN were analyzed for treatment location and adverse outcomes. Narrative descriptions were categorized into clinically relevant events, and descriptive statistics summarized complication frequencies and anatomic sites. RESULTS A total of 114 reports with 224 events were identified. The most frequent complications included textural changes ( n = 56, 25.0%), pigmentary alteration ( n = 41, 18.3%), and fat loss ( n = 26, 11.6%). Inflammatory reactions ( n = 18, 8.0%), burns ( n = 14, 6.3%), and pain ( n = 12, 5.4%) were also frequently reported. The face, neck, and abdomen were the most treated anatomic regions. CONCLUSION Although RFMN is generally safe, significant complications may occur. Experience and proper training are crucial to minimizing risks. Clinicians should counsel patients, monitor outcomes, and support surveillance and standardized reporting to improve safety.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chou et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c770f78bbfbc51511e0d88https://doi.org/10.1097/dss.0000000000005080
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Complications of radiofrequency microneedling: a comprehensive review2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Microneedling in the Treatment of Dermatological Conditions: A Systematic Review.2026 · 2 citations
  3. 3Navigating the Intersection of Radiofrequency Microneedling and Surgical Facelifts: Scoping Review2026
  4. 4Short-term efficacy and safety of 5MHz fractional microneedle radiofrequency for facial rejuvenation: a prospective study2026
  5. 5Microneedling radiofrequency in cosmetic dermatology and aesthetics2026