Observational cohort study uncovers distinct depression patterns in spinal cord injury patients, highlighting the need for monitoring.
PurposeTo identify and characterize latent trajectories of depression using growth mixture modeling (GMM) applied to irregularly timed assessments spanning up to 20 years post-injury, examine baseline rehabilitation variables significantly associated with trajectory membership, and determine predictors of sustained depressive burden.MethodsThis retrospective observational cohort study included adults with traumatic or non-traumatic spinal cord injury admitted for inpatient rehabilitation within 3 months post-injury (2005-2023), with follow-up extending until May 2025. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) at admission, discharge, and follow-up, totaling 3,258 assessments (n = 679 patients). GMM identified latent trajectories while accommodating irregularly spaced assessments. Predictors of trajectory membership were analyzed through multivariable regression with quantified model discrimination.ResultsA 3-class GMM solution provided optimal fit (entropy=0.75). Most participants (81.6%) followed a stable low-depression trajectory (Class 1). A borderline depression trajectory (Class 2; 8.4%) remained persistently elevated, while a probable depression trajectory (Class 3; 10.0%) displayed delayed worsening peaking at 5-7 years post-injury. Class 3 included a significantly higher proportion of non-traumatic injuries (63%) and females (44.1%), with most patients (85.3%) showing no depressive symptoms during rehabilitation, but later exhibiting a marked increase in depressive burden. Logistic regression predicting Class 2 achieved good discrimination (AUC=0.81; 95% CI, 0.65-0.97), identifying baseline depressive symptoms, tetraplegia, female sex, and primary level of education as significant predictors.ConclusionsIrregularly sampled follow-ups revealed distinct depression trajectories, including delayed-onset risk. Findings emphasize early rehabilitation-based screening and long-term monitoring to target follow-up and psychological support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
García-Rudolph et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: