Cross-sectional study identifies socio-economic, technical, and governance factors affecting borehole sustainability in rural DRC, suggesting needed improvements.
Background The sustainability of community-managed boreholes remains a major challenge in rural areas of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Frequent breakdowns and inadequate maintenance limit access to safe drinking water and increase exposure to water-related health risks. Methods A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted in six villages within the Bolobo Health Zone. Data were collected through guided interviews with 367 household heads and members of water management committees using a semi-structured questionnaire. Variables with a p-value < 0.20 in bivariate analysis were included in a multivariable logistic regression model, and those with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to assess associations. Results Low household income (aOR = 1.011; 95% CI: 1.001–1.059; p = 0.021) and non-contribution to water user fees (aOR = 3.21; 95% CI: 1.54–6.68; p = 0.002) were significantly associated with reduced borehole sustainability. Technical factors were particularly influential, including the absence of trained repair artisans (aOR = 124.5; 95% CI: 13.2–981.4; p < 0.001) and limited availability of spare parts. Institutional weaknesses also played a key role, with lack of trained management committees (aOR = 14.22; 95% CI: 2.45–82.1; p = 0.003) significantly compromising sustainability. Conclusions The sustainability of boreholes in Bolobo is shaped by socio-economic capacity, availability of technical support, and the strength of local governance structures. Strengthening financial contributions, building local technical expertise, and improving community-based management systems are critical to ensuring sustained access to safe drinking water in rural DRC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akongonguba et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: