This commentary examines the impact of course names on learning in first-year chemistry, suggesting new approaches to education.
The first chemistry courses that students take in college go by many names, including general chemistry, first-year chemistry and introductory chemistry. These may be evocative and powerful identifiers; they also may be problematic (arguably). In this paper, we consider “names” as a way of introducing key questions about what we teach, what our students learn, and what interests, prejudices, and passions both we and our students bring to the teaching and learning processes. We also lay the groundwork for a series of commentaries on first-year chemistry, in which we introduce an organization, the International Center for First-Year Undergraduate Chemistry Education (ICUC), formed to address the issues we face and to support those who teach these courses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Middlecamp et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: