Curriculum integration improves student preparation in environmental chemistry, indicating enhanced learning outcomes.
To provide students with better preparation for engaging in complex, real-world problems and a more realistic understanding of scientific inquiry, Radford University developed and assessed a laboratory curriculum testing the effectiveness of an on-campus wetland. This article contains an overview of a 10-period laboratory block in environmental chemistry designed specifically for junior- and senior-level chemistry majors at Radford University. Although the length and specifics of the module are tailored to test a specific environmental site, the expectation is that the module can be adapted to any environmental site and that pieces of the project can be used when such a large block of laboratory time is not available. Assessment of student perception by pre- and post-testing demonstrated an increased confidence with multiple standard techniques, a closing of the gap between the importance of an ability and their sense of preparedness, and an increase in their ability to design their own research project. Pre- and post-testing of student knowledge demonstrated significant gains overall and in data collection. Little effect was seen on their ability to analyze data, which is attributed to the high degree of previous student laboratory experience. One notable exception was an increase in knowledge of how to determine precision.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wirgau et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: