PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 28, 2026Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology0 citationsOpen Access

Clinical Significance of Cycle Threshold (Ct) Values for Predicting COVID‐19 Patient Outcome

View Full Paper
SPSergio Manuel Salas PachecoUniversidad Juárez del Estado de DurangoSVSebastián Eduardo González VillarrealDurango Institute of TechnologyDRDaniel Francisco Ramos RosalesUniversidad Juárez del Estado de Durango

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to evaluate the predictive significance of Ct values in determining COVID-19 patient outcomes.
  • Retrospective analysis of 16,372 COVID-19 patients in Durango, Mexico, from 2021 to 2023.
  • Utilized RT-qPCR to measure Ct values and classify patients into home monitoring, treatment, and severe cases.
  • Employed ANOVA and Student’s t-test to compare Ct values across patient classifications and survival status.
  • Conducted binary logistic regression to adjust for age, sex, symptoms, and comorbidities.
  • Performed ROC analysis to assess the predictive ability of Ct values.
  • Patients with Ct values < 25 were significantly more likely to have severe COVID-19 (p < 0.001).
  • Survivors had higher Ct values compared to deceased patients.
  • Ct < 25 was strongly associated with disease severity (OR = 2.06; 95% CI: 1.69–2.50; p < 0.001).
  • ROC analysis indicated excellent predictive ability for Ct values (AUC = 0.95).

Abstract

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is a highly accurate molecular tool widely used for the diagnosis of infectious diseases, including SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Among its key outputs, the Cycle Threshold (Ct) value indicates the number of amplification cycles required to detect the target genetic material, with lower Ct values reflecting higher concentrations of viral nucleic acids. In this retrospective study, we analyzed data from 16,372 patients diagnosed with COVID‐19 caused by SARS‐CoV‐2 using RT‐qPCR in Durango, Mexico, between 2021 and 2023. Patients were classified into home monitoring, in treatment, and severe cases, and survival status was recorded. ANOVA showed significantly lower Ct values in severe cases (Ct < 25, p < 0.001). The Student’s t‐test also identified significant differences between survivors and deceased patients. A binary logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, symptoms, and comorbidities, confirmed that Ct < 25 remained strongly associated with disease severity (OR = 2.06; 95% CI: 1.69–2.50; p < 0.001). ROC analysis demonstrated excellent predictive ability (AUC = 0.95), supporting the clinical utility of Ct values as a decision‐making tool.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pacheco et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c771988bbfbc51511e1948https://doi.org/10.1155/cjid/3839156
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper