Compares navigation-guided and freehand techniques for fiber post removal, highlighting differences in accuracy and dentin preservation.
Objectives: This study aims to compare static navigation-guided and conventional freehand techniques for fiber post removal in terms of dentin preservation, stress distribution, and procedural accuracy. Methods: Extracted human premolars will be endodontically treated and allocated into two groups: freehand removal and static navigation-guided removal using CBCT-based 3D-printed guides. Pre- and post-operative micro-computed tomography scans will assess dentin removal and microcrack formation. Finite element analysis will be conducted on CBCT-derived models to evaluate stress distribution and fracture risk. Results: The study is currently in progress and results are awaited. Conclusions: This investigation is expected to provide high-resolution evidence on the precision and biomechanical advantages of static navigation in endodontic retreatment procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: