Despite substantial research conducted over the past decades, the transition to a circular construction industry remains in its infancy. The deconstruction of buildings to recover materials for reuse is recognized as a promising strategy for advancing circularity. However, terminological ambiguity and a lack of conceptual consensus continue to lead to misinterpretation and may impede theoretical and practical progress. Based on a systematic literature review of 51 academic and non-academic sources, this paper analyzes the use of core terminology related to deconstruction processes. Ten central terms and expressions are identified, among which ‘demolition’ and ‘deconstruction’ are the most consistently applied, whereas ‘selective demolition’ is used with varying interpretations. To further document the current state of terminology in the field, a glossary of general terms commonly employed is also presented. Clear communication and the explicit definition of applied terms are essential to ensure efficient on-site construction processes and the relevance and value of future studies in this field. To this end, this study aims to enhance transparency and contribute to coherence within the terminological landscape of deconstruction research.
Salling et al. (Wed,) studied this question.