Comparative evaluation assesses cytotoxicity and growth of stem cells using e-MTA versus conventional MTA, indicating safety for use.
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity, proliferation, and differentiation potential of e-MTA compared to conventional MTA on human apical papilla-derived stem cells. Methods: Two dilutions of e-MTA and ProRoot MTA were tested using MTT assay, Alamar Blue assay, and Alizarin Red S staining at 24, 48, and 72 hours. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Cell viability and differentiation potential showed no significant difference between groups. However, e-MTA demonstrated significantly reduced proliferation compared to control MTA. Conclusions: e-MTA demonstrated comparable biocompatibility to conventional MTA, though reduced proliferation warrants further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jhunjhunwala et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: