A population-based survey explores e-cigarette use's associations among youth, indicating a need for effective control measures.
Introduction E-cigarette use is an emerging public health concern among adolescents and young adults, with limited population-based evidence on recent use and correlates in Thailand beyond school-based samples. Our study aimed to examine e-cigarette use and its associated factors among adolescents and young adults aged 15–29 years in Northern Thailand using data from a population-based household survey. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data from the 2024 population-based household survey on substance use in Northern Thailand. The analytic sample included 911 adolescents and young adults aged 15–29 years. Past-year e-cigarette use was the primary outcome. Explanatory variables encompassed sociodemographic characteristics, perceived accessibility, online information-seeking, perceived health harms, household stigma, and co-use of other substances. Descriptive statistics summarized prevalence, and logistic regression models estimated crude and adjusted associations, reporting odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Results Overall, 11.5% of participants reported past-year e-cigarette use. In adjusted analyses, higher perceived accessibility (AOR = 3.18; 95% CI: 1.31, 7.69, p = 0.010), online information-seeking (AOR = 4.22; 95% CI: 2.36, 7.55, p < 0.001), and past-year alcohol use (AOR = 5.88; 95% CI: 2.83, 12.22, p < 0.001) were associated with higher odds of e-cigarette use. In contrast, perceiving e-cigarettes as harmful (AOR = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.69, p = 0.001) and anticipating household stigma (AOR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.32, 0.95, p = 0.031) were associated with lower odds of use. Conclusion E-cigarette use among adolescents and young adults in Northern Thailand remains a public health concern shaped by accessibility, online exposure, alcohol co-use, and risk perceptions, underscoring the need for strengthened youth tobacco control, digital regulation, and integrated prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: