Survey reveals significant sex and racial disparities in diagnosis rates of IBS in US adults, suggesting the need for intervention.
ABSTRACT(256/260 WORDS INCL SUBHEADINGS) Background & Aims Limited data exist on healthcare disparities among individuals with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in the US. This study explored sex, race, and ethnic differences in healthcare-seeking behavior and IBS diagnosis rates among US adults. Methods Demographic and socioeconomic status, responses to the Rome IV IBS questionnaire plus IBS-related symptoms, healthcare-seeking behavior, and past healthcare provider (HCP)-based IBS diagnosis data were extracted from the 2020 US National Gastrointestinal Survey II. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between sex, race, and ethnicity on healthcare-seeking behavior and receipt of an IBS diagnosis from an HCP. Results Among 88,607 survey respondents, 5414 (6.1%) met Rome IV IBS criteria and were included in this analysis. Most were female (n = 3427; 63.3%), White (n = 4305; 79.5%), and non-Hispanic (n = 4731; 87.4%). Healthcare-seeking behavior was reported by 3875 (71.6%) of these respondents and was higher in females (73.3% vs 68.7% male; P = .008). Of these, 1274 (32.9%) received an HCP-based IBS diagnosis, which was proportionally higher in female than in male (36.5% vs 26.2%; P < .001) and in White than in Black/African American (35.0% vs 24.6%; P = .002) respondents, respectively. Hispanic respondents had a numerically lower HCP-based IBS diagnosis rate than non-Hispanic respondents (25.6% vs 34.0%; P = .084). Conclusion Among respondents meeting Rome IV IBS criteria, significant sex and racial disparities in healthcare-seeking behavior and HCP-based IBS diagnosis rates were observed. Further research is needed to understand the reasons underlying these disparities and implications on patient care and health outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almario et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: