Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This perspective uncovers androgen receptor's role in promoting immune exclusion in melanoma, suggesting new treatment strategies.
Melanoma frequently develops resistance to BRAF/MEK–targeted therapy and immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), often through therapy-driven tumor state transitions that include immune exclusion, transcriptional plasticity, and microenvironmental remodeling. B7-H3 (CD276) has been linked to immune-cold states and is being pursued as a therapeutic target. Yet, the upstream regulators that promote or stabilize B7-H3 immune exclusion in melanoma remain incompletely defined. Here, we propose a testable framework in which therapeutic pressure increases tumor-intrinsic androgen receptor (AR) signaling, which may promote or reinforce a B7-H3–linked immune-excluded resistance program. As a hypothesis-generating human anchor, in melanoma patients treated with anti-CTLA-4, AR and B7-H3 show no pre-treatment association, but a positive association emerges post-treatment. To avoid over-reliance on melanoma-specific preliminary observations, we integrate mechanistic precedent from other tumor contexts in which B7-H3 expression is shaped by defined signaling and epigenetic programs, including reported AR binding proximal to B7-H3 in prostate cancer and upstream control by stress- and growth-factor pathways. We then outline falsifiable mechanisms by which AR could interact with these regulatory nodes to increase B7-H3 output and barrier-like immune exclusion, and we highlight translational opportunities to therapeutically disrupt the AR–B7-H3 axis through modulation of the AR pathway and/or B7-H3–directed agents. This Perspective defines near-term experiments and study designs to validate directionality, delineate the relevant resistant tumor states, and establish a rational basis for combination therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mansini et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: