PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026Biomacromolecules1 citations

Tuning Protein Uptake through Charge and Hydrophobicity in Peptide-Based Complex Coacervates

View Full Paper
ASArvind SathyavageeswaranUniversity of Massachusetts AmherstMIMayayi IzzoUniversity of Massachusetts AmherstJSJúlia Bonesso SabadiniUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)

Key Points

  • Investigate how peptide charge density, charge patterning, and hydrophobicity influence protein uptake in coacervates.
  • Systematic investigation of peptide charge density and patterning
  • Comparative studies with hen egg white lysozyme (HEWL) and bovine serum albumin (BSA)
  • Characterization of coacervate-forming synthetic polypeptides
  • Protein uptake is highly sensitive to peptide sequence features and hydrophobicity.
  • Localized charge patches on HEWL show sensitivity to peptide charge density and patterning.
  • BSA displays preferential partitioning into hydrophobic coacervates.

Abstract

Protein encapsulation holds considerable promise for applications spanning the food, pharmaceuticals, biocatalysis, and personal care industries. Complex coacervation─an associative liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) process─has recently emerged as an effective strategy for achieving high protein loading while maintaining protein structure and function. In this work, we systematically investigate the influence of the coacervate-forming peptide charge density, charge patterning, and hydrophobicity on the partitioning of two model proteins: hen egg white lysozyme (HEWL) and bovine serum albumin (BSA). Using a rationally designed library of synthetic polypeptides, we demonstrate that protein uptake is highly sensitive to both the sequence features and hydrophobicity of the peptides, as well as the surface charge characteristics of the protein cargo. In particular, the localized charge patches on HEWL were sensitive to peptide charge density and patterning, while the hydrophobic character of BSA resulted in preferential partitioning into more hydrophobic coacervates. These findings highlight the critical role of spatial charge distribution and sequence composition in governing protein-coacervate interactions, offering new design principles for tailoring coacervate systems for bioencapsulation and related applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sathyavageeswaran et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c195de0f0f753b39bee8https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5c02639
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Polyelectrolyte Complex Based Interfacial Drug Delivery System with Controlled Loading and Improved Release Performance for Bone Therapeutics2016 · 43 citations
  2. 2Functional polymer microspheres2000 · 946 citations
  3. 3Microphase Behavior and Enhanced Wet-Cohesion of Synthetic Copolyampholytes Inspired by a Mussel Foot Protein2015 · 149 citations
  4. 4Limiting laws and counterion condensation in polyelectrolyte solutions. 7. Electrophoretic mobility and conductance1981 · 266 citations
  5. 5Incorporation of proteins into complex coacervates2020 · 16 citations