PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026Journal of Nuclear Medicine0 citations

Prognostic Value of Early Follow-Up PSMA PET/CT After 2 Cycles of 177 LuLu-PSMA RPT in Patients with mCRPC: Comparison with PSA Dynamics

View Full Paper
LWLiam WidjajaJHJohannes HornfeckSSSophie C. Siegmund

Key Points

  • To assess the prognostic value of early follow-up PSMA PET/CT compared to PSA dynamics in mCRPC patients undergoing treatment.
  • Conducted a retrospective evaluation of 109 mCRPC patients receiving Lu-PSMA radiopharmaceutical therapy.
  • Performed baseline and follow-up PSMA PET/CT scans after 2 treatment cycles.
  • Compared PSMA tumor volume and SUV metrics with PSA level changes for prognostic evaluation.
  • Utilized univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to assess predictive performance for overall survival.
  • Significant correlation between changes in PSMA tumor volume and PSA levels (P ≤ 0.006).
  • Changes in TL-PSMA and PSMA-TV were predictive for overall survival (P = 0.012 and P = 0.014, respectively).
  • TL-PSMA change showed the best identification of patients at risk for shorter survival (HR 2.298, P = 0.004), outperforming PSA change (HR 1.292, P = 0.369).
  • TL-PSMA change emerged as the sole independent predictor of overall survival in multivariate analysis (P = 0.016).

Abstract

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is recommended for response evaluation during 177LuLu-PSMA radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Evidence supporting the predictive value of such a follow-up PSMA PET/CT relative to changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) monitoring is limited. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated 109 patients with mCRPC receiving 177LuLu-PSMA RPT. Patients underwent 18FF-PSMA-1007 PET/CT at baseline and after 2 cycles of RPT. We compared baseline and follow-up scans to assess relative changes in PSMA tumor volume (PSMA-TV), SUVmean, and total lesion PSMA (TL-PSMA, defined as PSMA-TV × SUVmean). PSA change was also defined as the change from baseline to follow-up after the second cycle. The prognostic performance of laboratory and image-based changes for overall survival (OS) were then tested using univariate Cox regression. We also performed Kaplan-Meier analysis, applying a 25% threshold for increases in PSA level and PET-based parameters. Finally, direct comparison of the predictive value was tested in multivariate Cox regression, applying the same cutoff. Results: Relative changes in volumetric PET-based parameters after 2 cycles of RPT correlated significantly with the change in PSA level (P ≤ 0.006 for each), validating the reliability of PET quantification of changes for response evaluation. In a univariate analysis, changes in PSMA-TV (P = 0.012) and TL-PSMA (P = 0.014) were predictive for OS, with PSA change providing comparable significance (P = 0.012). Applying the established 25% threshold for increase, TL-PSMA change best identified patients at risk for shorter OS (hazard ratio HR, 2.298; P = 0.004), outperforming both PSA change (HR, 1.292; P = 0.369) and PSMA-TV change (HR, 1.798; P = 0.024). Further, TL-PSMA change emerged as the sole independent predictor of OS in multivariate analysis (P = 0.016). Conclusion: During RPT, relative changes in volumetric PET metrics from baseline to follow-up PSMA PET/CT demonstrated superior predictive value over PSA monitoring. These results highlight the clinical utility of repeat PSMA PET/CT in patients with mCRPC and indicate that follow-up scans during treatment should not be omitted.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Widjaja et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c195de0f0f753b39bf60https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.125.271859
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper