Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This research examines operational strategies for LNG dual-fuel ships facing emission regulations, suggesting effective cost-cutting measures.
The liner shipping industry is thriving in the low-carbon transition, and optimizing operational strategies for liquefied natural gas (LNG) dual-fuel ships has become a research hotspot. This research examines the impacts of the carbon tax, emission control area (ECA) policies, fuel price discounts and methane slip rate on fuel management strategies. Firstly, to reduce liner operating costs and adhere to ECA policies, this study develops a basic optimization model. Further, the model is extended to take into account the impact of fuel price discounts. Secondly, by linearizing multiple nonlinear terms, the operational strategies are obtained. Thirdly, taking a real vessel sailing between the Far East and Northwest Europe as a case study, this study identifies the ports for LNG and very low sulfur fuel oil (VLSFO) bunkering, determines the bunkering amounts and calculates the planned speeds. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses are conducted on fuel price difference, carbon tax rate and methane slip rate. Results show that fuel price difference, carbon tax rate, methane slip rate and fuel price discount exert a significant impact on ship operational decisions. To ensure the effectiveness of maritime decarbonization regulations, authorities should monitor ship engines with high methane slip rates. This study offers important references for shipping enterprises to meet ship emission policies and simultaneously cut operational costs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: