Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study comparing clinical features and immunological profiles in bullous pemphigoid, suggesting significant differences in management approaches.
Bullous pemphigoid (BP) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI-BP) is a rare immune-related adverse event that affects patient prognosis and management; however, comparative data between ICI-BP and non-ICI BP, especially the dynamic changes of antibodies remain scarce. Therefore, we conducted this study to compare clinical presentation, immunological profile, treatment, management, and outcomes of ICI-BP versus non-ICI BP. This was a retrospective, single-centre cohort study of consecutive patients between 2019 and 2025. Patients with ICI-BP (Group A) were compared with Group B (BP with concurrent malignancy but no ICI exposure) and Group C (classic BP). There were 34, 10, and 68 patients enrolled in Groups A, B, and C, respectively (median follow-up 24.5 months, IQR 10.8-50.0). ICI-BP presented at a younger age (median, 59.0 years; IQR, 53.3-69.5; p < 0.001) and showed a marked male predominance (88.2%; p = 0.003). A transient, albeit non-significant, rise in anti-BP180 reactivity was observed during the first 2 months in ICI-BP. Systemic glucocorticoids were required more frequently in ICI-BP, and IL-4 inhibitors demonstrated superior potency in accelerating BP180 antibody decline compared to non-systematic therapy. Tumour response rates were similar between Groups A and B, as was mortality across the three groups. In conclusion, ICI-BP differs from non-ICI BP in clinical and immunological features and more often necessitates systemic glucocorticoid therapy, while IL-4 inhibitors potentially expedite the reduction of anti-BP180 antibodies in ICI-BP patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: