Comparative study investigates hardness and toughness in binder-free carbide ceramics, suggesting improved processing methods.
This comparative study investigates binder-free binary WC-TiC and ternary WC-TiC-TaC carbide ceramics as alternatives to cobalt-bonded hard materials. Equimolar compositions were processed via high-energy ball milling (HEBM) and consolidated by spark plasma sintering (SPS) at 1700–2100 °C. X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) revealed fundamentally different homogenization kinetics: the ternary system achieved a complete single-phase structure at 2000 °C, 100 °C earlier than the binary system. This acceleration correlates with finer initial particle size (2–5 μm vs. 3–10 μm) and near-stoichiometric TaC, facilitating interdiffusion. Lattice parameter evolution confirmed the formation of (W,Ti)C and (W,Ti,Ta)C substitutional solid solutions. Mechanical characterization showed contrasting behaviors: binary WC-TiC exhibits maximum hardness at 1900 °C (1793 HV30, fracture toughness 5.07 MPa·m1/2), while ternary WC-TiC-TaC peaks at 1700–1800 °C (1947–1782 HV30) with higher toughness (max 5.42 MPa·m1/2). Optimal processing windows with acceptable property uniformity are 1800–1900 °C (binary) and 1700–1900 °C (ternary). The binary system offers superior toughness and stability; the ternary system enables faster processing and higher initial hardness, defining distinct application domains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buravlev et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: