PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering0 citations

An Optimized Algorithm for the Mitigation of Numerical Oscillations in Engineering Simulations: A Case Study in Grain Aeration Modeling

View Full Paper
DRDaniel RigoniMPMárcio Augusto Villela PintoJEJotair Elio

Key Points

  • The study aims to develop a predictive framework to derive the viscosity coefficient analytically for mitigating numerical oscillations in engineering simulations.
  • Introduced a closed-form law for viscosity based on discretization parameters through offline optimization.
  • Demonstrated the methodology using finite differences with the Leith scheme in grain aeration modeling.
  • Verified the model using an apparent order-of-convergence analysis for assessing discretization error.
  • Achieved second-order accuracy in the stabilized formulation, while the unstabilized model exhibited order degradation.
  • Validation against experimental data showed comparable accuracy to manual calibration with greater stability.
  • Shortened computational time to 3.5 seconds per run compared to 162.1 seconds for traditional mesh refinement.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Spurious oscillations are a recurring challenge in numerical simulations of advection‐dominated transport, often degrading stability and predictive accuracy. Artificial viscosity is commonly employed to mitigate these effects, but its coefficient is usually tuned empirically, limiting reproducibility and scalability. This study introduces a predictive framework in which the viscosity coefficient is derived analytically from discretization parameters through a closed‐form law obtained via offline optimization guided by a smoothness metric. The methodology is demonstrated for grain aeration, a coupled heat‐moisture transport problem of high practical relevance. The mathematical model was solved using finite differences with the Leith scheme, known for enhanced robustness under realistic aeration conditions. Verification based on apparent order‐of‐convergence analysis of the discretization error confirmed that the stabilized formulation recovered second‐order accuracy, while the unstabilized model exhibited order degradation. Validation against experimental data showed accuracy comparable to manual calibration but with greater stability. Smoothness analysis revealed oscillations only in the energy balance, with mass‐balance equations remaining naturally smooth. Once trained, the predictive law added negligible computational cost (3.5 s per run vs. 162.1 s for mesh refinement ‐ a well‐known technique for reducing oscillations in numerical solutions). The approach eliminates empirical tuning, ensures convergence under experimental conditions, and achieves substantial computational savings for coupled transport problems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rigoni et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c25dde0f0f753b39ca01https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.70304
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper