Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analyzes risks in activated carbon production, revealing safety issues and suggesting improvements.
Rotary kiln-based activated carbon production combines high-temperature operation with flammable/reducing gases, carbonaceous dust, and downstream off-gas treatment and acid/base washing, creating complex escalation pathways. This study prioritizes safety improvements by applying classical failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) and a transparent Fuzzy-FMEA framework to 18 representative failure modes (six each for kiln/activation, acid/base handling, and atmosphere/control). Five experts evaluated Severity, Occurrence, and Detection on a 10-point scale. The fuzzy model used triangular membership functions (L/M/H), a monotonic 27-rule base, Mamdani max–min inference, and centroid defuzzification to compute a continuous fuzzy risk priority number (FRPN, 0–10). Classical FMEA identified dust explosion (RPN = 405), temperature control failure (RPN = 378), and off-gas leakage (RPN = 324) as the highest-ranked risks. Fuzzy-FMEA preserved the top-risk group while more strongly highlighting barrier-related risks, placing off-gas leakage, instrumentation/interlock failure, and electrostatic ignition control alongside dust explosion (FRPN 9.221–9.332). The rankings were strongly correlated (Spearman ρ = 0.871; Kendall τ = 0.752), yet mid-risk items were rearranged (mean |Δrank| = 2.06; max = 5), improving discrimination within tied RPN clusters. The five highest-priority scenarios were reconstructed into actionable engineering packages, including dust and ignition control, off-gas integrity linked to shutdown logic, interlock proof testing and bypass management, and independent protection layers for kiln temperature control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: