PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026Processes2 citationsOpen Access

Study on Risk Analysis of a Rotary Kiln-Based Activated Carbon Manufacturing Process Using Fuzzy-FMEA

View Full Paper
JKJong Gu KimBBByong Chol Bai

Key Points

  • This research aims to identify and prioritize safety risks in the rotary kiln-based activated carbon manufacturing process using Fuzzy-FMEA.
  • Applied classical FMEA and Fuzzy-FMEA to evaluate 18 failure modes.
  • Five experts rated failure modes on a 10-point scale for Severity, Occurrence, and Detection.
  • Used triangular membership functions and a monotonic 27-rule base for fuzzy analysis.
  • Calculated fuzzy risk priority numbers (FRPN) with Mamdani inference and centroid defuzzification.
  • Classical FMEA identified dust explosion, temperature control failure, and off-gas leakage as top risks.
  • Fuzzy-FMEA underscored off-gas leakage and other barrier-related risks alongside dust explosion.
  • Strong correlation found between classical and fuzzy ranking methods (Spearman ρ = 0.871).
  • Actionable engineering packages were developed for improvements in dust control, off-gas integrity, and temperature safety.

Abstract

Rotary kiln-based activated carbon production combines high-temperature operation with flammable/reducing gases, carbonaceous dust, and downstream off-gas treatment and acid/base washing, creating complex escalation pathways. This study prioritizes safety improvements by applying classical failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) and a transparent Fuzzy-FMEA framework to 18 representative failure modes (six each for kiln/activation, acid/base handling, and atmosphere/control). Five experts evaluated Severity, Occurrence, and Detection on a 10-point scale. The fuzzy model used triangular membership functions (L/M/H), a monotonic 27-rule base, Mamdani max–min inference, and centroid defuzzification to compute a continuous fuzzy risk priority number (FRPN, 0–10). Classical FMEA identified dust explosion (RPN = 405), temperature control failure (RPN = 378), and off-gas leakage (RPN = 324) as the highest-ranked risks. Fuzzy-FMEA preserved the top-risk group while more strongly highlighting barrier-related risks, placing off-gas leakage, instrumentation/interlock failure, and electrostatic ignition control alongside dust explosion (FRPN 9.221–9.332). The rankings were strongly correlated (Spearman ρ = 0.871; Kendall τ = 0.752), yet mid-risk items were rearranged (mean |Δrank| = 2.06; max = 5), improving discrimination within tied RPN clusters. The five highest-priority scenarios were reconstructed into actionable engineering packages, including dust and ignition control, off-gas integrity linked to shutdown logic, interlock proof testing and bypass management, and independent protection layers for kiln temperature control.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c25dde0f0f753b39cb09https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14071071
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Spontaneous Combustion Characteristics of Activated Carbon Modified via Liquid Phase Impregnation during Drying2023 · 13 citations
  2. 2A review on activated carbon modifications for the treatment of wastewater containing anionic dyes2022 · 236 citations
  3. 3Solid inertants and their use in dust explosion prevention and mitigation2005 · 203 citations
  4. 4Effects of vent ducts on the reduced pressures from explosions in dust collectors1998 · 15 citations
  5. 5Modelling and optimization of proof testing policies for safety instrumented systems2008 · 74 citations