Abstract Comparison of the electronic igntp edition of John and new digital images of Codex Boreelianus (F 09) shows that a number of improvements can be made. Besides some corrected readings, a small portion of new text can be found on the new images. Shortcomings of the igntp edition in its representation of F (09) can mostly be attributed to the limitations of the microfilm with which the collators had to work. Some room for discussion is indicated concerning the correctors of the manuscript, its accentuation and word division, and its segmentation.
Jan Krans (Fri,) studied this question.