PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026Applied Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Experimental Evaluation of Vibration and Noise Responses of a Diesel Engine Fueled with Sour Cherry Pyrolytic Oil–Butanol–Diesel Blends with 2-EHN Additive

View Full Paper
MBMurat BaklacıSakarya UniversityHDHüseyin DalSakarya University

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the impact of sour cherry pyrolysis oil and butanol blends on vibration and noise in diesel engines.
  • Five fuel types were prepared including neat diesel and various blends with SCPO, butanol, and 2-EHN.
  • Tests conducted on a single-cylinder diesel engine at a fixed load of 10 Nm.
  • Vibration and noise data were collected at different engine speeds under steady-state conditions.
  • The D40/SCPO10/B45/2-EHN5 blend showed a 37.5% reduction in overall RMS vibration compared to neat diesel.
  • This blend also recorded the lowest equivalent sound level among the tested fuels.

Abstract

With rising global energy demand and the gradual depletion of petroleum-based resources, interest in alternative fuels for internal combustion diesel engines (ICDEs) has increased. In ICDEs, firing-related and mechanical excitations may result in adverse vibration and noise responses. This study examines whether incorporating sour cherry pit pyrolysis oil (SCPO) with n-butanol and 2-ethylhexyl nitrate (2-EHN) may reduce vibration and noise under constant-load, steady-state operating conditions compared with neat diesel (D100). For the experimental tests, five fuel types were prepared: one neat diesel fuel and four blended fuels with a constant diesel fraction of 40% and a fixed 2-ethylhexyl nitrate (2-EHN) content of 5%, while the SCPO and n-butanol fractions were varied (D40/SCPO0/B55/2-EHN5, D40/SCPO5/B50/2-EHN5, D40/SCPO10/B45/2-EHN5, and D40/SCPO15/B40/2-EHN5). Experiments were performed using a single-cylinder ICDE at a fixed load of 10 Nm under steady-state conditions at engine speeds of 1500, 1800, 2400, 3000, and 3600 rpm. For each operating condition, vibration and noise data were recorded over a 10.4 s window. Experimental findings indicate that D40/SCPO10/B45/2-EHN5 yielded the lowest mean overall RMS vibration, with a 37.5% reduction relative to neat diesel (D100), and the lowest equivalent sound level (LAeq) among the tested fuels. Under the investigated steady-state constant-load conditions, the D40/SCPO10/B45/2-EHN5 fuel blend demonstrates the potential to achieve lower measured vibration and noise levels than neat diesel.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Baklacı et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c28cde0f0f753b39ce06https://doi.org/10.3390/app16073215
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper