Key result
Novel biomarkers combined with hs-cTn enhance early detection and risk stratification for MINS within 4 hours.
Why the study?
Cardiac troponin has limited sensitivity during the early hours after myocardial ischemia, highlighting the need for complementary biomarkers to detect MINS before irreversible necrosis occurs.
Do emerging circulating biomarkers and multi-marker panels improve the early detection and prognostic stratification of myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery compared to cardiac troponin alone?
Do emerging circulating biomarkers and multi-marker panels improve the early detection and prognostic stratification of myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery compared to cardiac troponin alone?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review highlights that integrating emerging biomarkers (such as H-FABP, IMA, cMyC, and sST2) into multi-marker panels alongside high-sensitivity cardiac troponin has the potential to bridge the early diagnostic blind window and improve prognostic stratification for myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery.
Myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) is a common and clinically important postoperative complication associated with increased short- and long-term mortality. As most cases lack typical ischemic symptoms, diagnosis relies primarily on systematic postoperative biomarker surveillance. Current guidelines recommend serial postoperative measurement of cardiac troponin (cTn) or high-sensitivity cTn, the reference-standard biomarker for myocardial necrosis, in patients at elevated perioperative risk. However, cTn demonstrates limited sensitivity during the early h following myocardial ischemia, underscoring the need for complementary biomarkers capable of detecting ischemic injury before the onset of irreversible myocardial necrosis or troponin elevation. This review summarizes recent advances in emerging circulating biomarkers for early MINS detection, including heart-type fatty acid–binding protein, ischemia-modified albumin, cardiac myosin-binding protein C, copeptin, and other markers reflecting ischemia, necrosis, inflammation, and fibrosis. We critically examine their underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnostic performance, and release kinetics, highlighting their potential to shorten the diagnostic “blind window” associated with conventional biomarkers. The integration of multi-marker panels represents a promising strategy to enhance early diagnostic sensitivity and improve prognostic stratification. Nonetheless, large-scale prospective studies are required to validate their clinical utility and define their role in perioperative decision-making and guideline development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) conducted a review in Myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS). Emerging circulating cardiac biomarkers (e.g., H-FABP, IMA, cMyC, sST2, NT-proBNP, choline, galectin-3, hs-CRP, MPO, copeptin) vs. Conventional cardiac troponin (cTn / hs-cTn) surveillance was evaluated on Early detection and prognostic stratification of myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS). Integrating emerging biomarkers like H-FABP, IMA, and cMyC with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin shortens the early diagnostic blind window (<4 hours) and improves MINS risk stratification.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: