Hurricanes routinely damage forests across the North Atlantic Basin, yet efforts to characterize their impacts have had mixed subregional success. To elucidate these challenges, this study analyzed pre- and post-hurricane land surface phenology (LSP) for 44 moderate and strong hurricanes over 22 years using the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI). We statistically grouped storms based on their long-term climate attributes, then compared subregional impacts with wind speed and land cover. After accounting for wind speed, responses differed among the six subregions. The Southeast U.S. showed declines in EVI for the first winter and first year post storm, but this response was weak or absent elsewhere. The Central America region declined in the first winter but not in the subsequent growing season, while four other regions showed no increased impact with wind speed in either season. We then examined six category 4 hurricanes using a forest mask. In dry areas, drought-sensitive vegetation explained weak responses, whereas in the humid tropics, rapid refoliation or sprouting was common. These factors complicate optical remote sensing assessments. Rapid evaluations can mistake defoliation for more substantial damage, and delayed assessments can confuse EVI recovery with structural recovery. Results underscore the need for ecologically tailored monitoring approaches.
Topete-Pozas et al. (Fri,) studied this question.