Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluation of agar panels assesses antifungal susceptibility in Trichophyton isolates, suggesting effectiveness for clinical testing.
The aim of this paper is to evaluate the performance of the Derma-SR-screen agar for accurate discrimination between susceptible and non-susceptible clinical Trichophyton isolates. Consecutive Trichophyton isolates, received for identification and susceptibility testing, were screened for terbinafine and itraconazole resistance using Liofilchem Derma-SR-screen 4-well panels alongside EUCAST reference testing (E.Def 11.0). EUCAST tentative ECOFFs (terbinafine: T. rubrum 0.03 mg/L; T. indotineae 0.125 mg/L; itraconazole: both species: 0.25 mg/L) were applied for wild-type/non-wild-type classification. Plates were evaluated after 5 days of incubation at 25 °C, with growth graded 0-+++. Faint growth (+) was disregarded. All isolates underwent sqle sequencing. Forty isolates were included; 25 were non-wild-type harbouring Sqle alterations (F397I (number (n) = 1), F397L (n = 17), L393F (n = 3), L393S (n = 1), and Q408L (n = 3)). On day 5, 21 isolates reached +++ growth in the control well; a further 10 reached this level on day 6. The remaining isolates reached a ++/+++ score after 5/6 days (n = 7/n = 2). The 0.125 mg/L terbinafine agar correctly identified 7/8 non-wild-type T. indotineae isolates (4/5 F397L and 3/3 Q408L alterations), all 17 non-wild-type and eight wild-type T. rubrum isolates, as well as the five wild-type isolates of other Trichophyton spp. The 0.016 mg/L agar correctly identified all 17 non-wild-type T. rubrum isolates, but misclassified 2/8 wild-type isolates as non-wild-type. All isolates were wild-type to itraconazole and correctly identified. The Derma-SR-screen agar resulted in correct classification of 24/25 (96%) sqle mutant T. indotineae and T. rubrum isolates. Two wild-type T. rubrum isolates grew at the 0.016 mg/L terbinafine agar suggesting possible reduced agar potency at this concentration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jørgensen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: