Discusses the challenges and roles of supervisors in banks' IFRS 9 implementation, suggesting regulatory improvements.
The paper explores the role of banking supervisors with respect to banks’ implementation of IFRS 9. It discusses: the benefits associated with IFRS 9 as well as the main challenges from banking soundness and risk management perspectives; the role that banking supervisors should play in achieving a robust implementation of IFRS 9; and steps that can be taken to implement IFRS 9 in a proportionate and sound manner while minimizing procyclicality. It argues that authorities should consider introducing a transition period to provide sufficient preparation time for banks and banking supervisors, with an appropriate sequencing of key tasks to be completed; IFRS 9 should be implemented in a proportionate and sound manner; and regulatory provisioning systems used as prudential backstop should be maintained until supervisors have gained sufficient experience with IFRS 9.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Awad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: