PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Understanding GMOs Through the Debate Method: What Do Students Think

MKMeryem KONU KADİRHANOĞULLARIEKEsra ÖZAY KÖSE

Key Points

  • The research aims to explore university students' perspectives on GMOs through the debate method.
  • Conducted qualitative research using a case study design
  • Involved 23 university students selected through non-probability sampling
  • Participants engaged in active debate, jury, and listener roles
  • Data collected via semi-structured interviews with open-ended questions
  • Data analyzed using descriptive and content analysis methods
  • Debate method improved critical thinking, empathy, and communication skills
  • Increased interest and participation in the topic of GMOs
  • Identified challenges such as time management and social interaction imbalances

Abstract

The aim of this research is to examine university students’ views on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) when the topic is explored through the debate method. The research used the case study method, which is one of the qualitative research designs. The participants consisted of 23 volunteer students studying at a state university in the 2024-2025 academic year. The non-probability sampling method was used in the sample selection. Eight of these students were assigned to active debate groups, while the others were assigned to jury and listener roles. Data were collected through a semi-structured interview form consisting of 6 open-ended questions developed by the researchers and shaped by expert opinions. The interviews were conducted online after the debate activity was completed, and the obtained data were evaluated using descriptive analysis and content analysis methods. The research showed that the debate method developed critical thinking, empathy, multi-dimensional thinking and communication skills in students; and increased interest and participation in the subject. However, some difficulties such as time management, imbalance of participation and social interaction were observed. As a result, it shows the debate method makes significant contributions to learning, but difficulties may arise during application.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

KADİRHANOĞULLARI et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c2d1de0f0f753b39d336https://doi.org/10.38089/iperj.2025.238
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper