PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026Health Science Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Pediatric Diagnostic Reference Levels for Chest X‐Rays in the Northern Cape Province of South Africa: A Descriptive Study

View Full Paper
OLO. L. LackayJHJ. Horn‐LodewykHMH. Muller

Key Points

  • The study aims to establish pediatric diagnostic reference levels (PiDRLs) for chest X-rays in the Northern Cape Province.
  • Calculated PiDRLs for 375 pediatric patients categorized by weight bands and age groups.
  • Conducted an image quality assessment using a checklist.
  • Determined PiDRLs as the 75th percentile of the dose distribution for fixed X-ray units.
  • Mean PiDRLs were 0.2 mGy for weight groups < 15 kg and 0.3 mGy for weight groups 30–50 kg.
  • Mean PiDRLs for age groups < 10 years were 0.2 mGy, with values of 0.3 mGy for ages 10–12 years.
  • Image quality consistently met acceptable standards, with results slightly exceeding international benchmarks.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background and Aims The International Commission on Radiological Protection emphasizes dose optimization for pediatric patients due to their higher radiosensitivity. Establishing diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) supports this goal during radiological examinations. This study aimed to establish pediatric diagnostic reference levels (PiDRLs) for anteroposterior (AP) chest X‐rays across four hospitals in the Northern Cape Province, South Africa. Methods PiDRLs were calculated for 375 pediatric patients (birth to 12 years) categorized by weight bands and age groups. Image quality was assessed using an image quality assessment checklist. DRLs were determined as the 75th percentile of the dose distribution for fixed X‐ray units. An image quality assessment was performed to establish if the dose levels consistently produced images of acceptable diagnostic quality. Results Mean PiDRLs for weight groups < 5 kg, 5– < 15 kg, 15– < 30 kg, 30– < 50 kg were 0.2 mGy, 0.2 mGy, 0.2 mGy, and 0.3 mGy, respectively. Corresponding values for age groups < 1 year, 1– < 5 years, 5– < 10 years, and 10– < 12 years were 0.2 mGy, 0.2 mGy, 0.3 mGy, and 0.3 mGy, respectively. Image quality was consistently high, with the 75th percentile slightly exceeding international benchmarks. The image quality assessment confirmed that the dose levels produced images of acceptable image quality. Conclusion PiDRLs match select international benchmarks, offering a baseline for South African optimization. This study contributes valuable regional data to support radiation safety and dose optimization in pediatric medical imaging in South Africa.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lackay et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c2e4de0f0f753b39d542https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.72185
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper