PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 20260 citationsOpen Access

THE TEL-DAN STELE A Roman Boundary Marker of Humiliation on the Via Dolorosa of Mattathias Antigonus II (Summer −37 BCE)

View Full Paper
DDDin Darya

Key Points

  • To re-date the Tel Dan Stele from the 9th century BCE to a Roman monument established in −36 BCE.
  • Critical review of historical documents and archaeological evidence.
  • Analysis of script morphology and terminus style.
  • Examination of geographical references along the King's Highway.
  • Assessment of psalmic connections in relation to the Hasmonean dynasty.
  • The stele is identified as a Roman-Herodian marker of humiliation.
  • It commemorates Mattathias Antigonus II's passage toward execution.
  • Evident archaism indicates deliberate historical referencing to the House of David.

Abstract

I. NOTE TO THE READER This document is a working preprint submitted for critical review. It makes no claim toexhaustiveness or definitive certainty. It proposes a reasoned re-dating of the Tel Dan Stele andexplicitly invites remarks, objections, and contributions from any specialist — epigraphist,archaeologist, historian of Hellenistic Judaism, or Roman studies scholar.The central hypothesis is that the stele, traditionally dated to the 9th century BCE, is in fact aRoman-Herodian monument erected in −36 BCE to commemorate the humiliation and passage ofMattathias Antigonus II — the last Hasmonean king and last living "son of David" — on the road tohis forced exile toward Antioch.II. ABSTRACT EnglishThe Tel Dan Stele (discovered in 1993) is here re-dated as a Roman-Herodian boundary marker ofhumiliation, carved in −36 BCE by Herod and Sosius to commemorate the exact spot whereMattathias Antigonus II and his column of prisoners crossed the northern border of Judea on theirway to execution in Antioch. The expression bytdwd ("House of David") refers to the livingHasmonean dynasty of the 1st century BCE. Deliberate archaism of the script, the morphology of aRoman terminus, the geography of the King's Highway, the psalmic semantics (Psalm 89) and theGalilean memory sixty years later in the Gospels all converge on this re-dating. Palaeography, takenas a criterion of last resort, can no longer serve as the sole dating argument.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Din Darya (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c2e4de0f0f753b39d60bhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19220248
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1TEL DAN STELE (1993): FIRST BACK-TRANSLATION OF THE TEXT INTO KOINE GREEK2026
  2. 2Tel Dan Stele - A Historical and Archaeological Impossibility of a -9th Century BCE Dating2026
  3. 3Le fragment de Tell Afis compltéterait la stèle de Tel Dan...2026
  4. 4The Tel Dan Stele's Mention of the Psalms of Solomon (63 to 44 BCE)2026
  5. 5The Tell Afis Fragment and the Tel Dan Stele: Physical, Philological, and Semantic Convergences — A Case for a Common Assembly2026