PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026Evolving Earth1 citationsOpen Access

Groundwater Potential Zonation in a Tropical Hard-Rock Basin, South India: An Evidence-Based Approach

View Full Paper
MRMC RaicyCACD AjuAAAL Achu

Key Points

  • The research aims to identify regions with varying groundwater availability in the Kadalundi River Basin.
  • Utilized Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Geographic Information System (GIS) techniques.
  • Analyzed key geo-environmental variables including geology, geomorphology, and groundwater level fluctuations.
  • Conducted validation of groundwater potential zonation with subsurface geophysical signatures and well-yield data.
  • Groundwater potential zones classified as very poor, poor, moderate, high, and very high in specific proportions of the basin.
  • Lithology was identified as the most influential factor in groundwater occurrence.
  • The predicted groundwater index showed strong correlation with actual well yield (R² = 0.877).

Abstract

Groundwater potential zonation is a crucial tool for identifying regions with varying groundwater availability, integrating geological, hydrological, and environmental factors. This study evaluates the groundwater potential of the Kadalundi River Basin (KRB) in northern Kerala, India, using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Geographic Information System (GIS) techniques, and validates the results with subsurface geophysical signatures and well-yield data. Key geo-environmental variables, including geology, geomorphology, groundwater level fluctuations (GWLF), lineament density, land use/land cover (LU/LC), slope, soil texture, rainfall, topographic wetness index (TWI), terrain curvature, and topographic position index (TPI), were analyzed for their influence on groundwater occurrence. Based on the study, the groundwater potential zones in KRB were classified as very poor, poor, moderate, high, and very high, covering approximately 20.0%, 19.7%, 19.8%, 20.3%, and 20.2% of the basin, respectively, with high and very high zones concentrated mainly in the southeastern and western sectors. Lithology emerged as the most influential controlling factor (weight 0.246), followed by geomorphology (0.180). The reliability of the zonation was assessed using a two-fold validation based on VES (Vertical Electrical Sounding) and observed well yield data. The predicted index showed strong agreement with well yield (R 2 = 0.877). The spatial variability of groundwater potential across KRB provides valuable insights for sustainable groundwater management. The study provides a reliable background for groundwater potential assessment in similar hydrogeological settings and supports informed decision-making for water resource planning in the region.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Raicy et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c30dde0f0f753b39da74https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eve.2026.100121
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Groundwater potential zonation using geographic information system and analytical hierarchy process in a semi-arid hard rock terrain: A case study of Mettur Taluk, Tamil Nadu, India2026
  2. 2Delineation of Groundwater potential zone using Geospatial and AHP techniques in Ken River Basin (KRB) in Central India2024 · 6 citations
  3. 3AHP and Geospatial technology-based assessment of groundwater potential zones in Natham taluk, Tamil nadu, India2025
  4. 4Mapping of Groundwater Potential Zones in the Kuzhithuraiyar Sub Basin of Kodayar River, Kanniyakumari District, Tamilnadu: Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and GIS2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5A Multi-criterian Approach to Identify Groundwater Potential Zones in the Subarnarekha River Basin Using Integrated Analytical Hierarchy Process and Geospatial Technology2024 · 1 citations