Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ProTact improves protein-protein interaction predictions, enhancing docking accuracy in low MSA scenarios.
AlphaFold has set a new standard for predicting protein structures from primary sequences; however, it faces challenges with protein complexes across species, engineered proteins, and antigen-antibody interactions, where co-evolutionary signals may be sparse or missing. Herein, we present ProTact, a SE(3)-invariant geometric graph neural network that integrates physics-informed geometric complementarity and trigonometric constraints as inductive biases to enhance protein-protein contact predictions. ProTact is applicable to both experimental and predicted monomer structures and utilizes a modulated key point matching algorithm to approximate accurate docking poses. Experimental evaluations demonstrate that ProTact consistently outperforms state-of-the-art sequence-based and structure-based methods on benchmark datasets, achieving notable relative improvements of 31.63% in average top-10 precision (Precision@10) for CASP 13 and 14 targets and 31.94% for DIPS-Plus datasets on high-quality structures. While performance naturally declines on the more challenging unbound complexes due to large conformational changes, ProTact maintains a competitive edge over baselines. Moreover, when combined with AlphaFold3 as re-scoring functions, ProTact surpasses its default confidence scores, offering over 30.48% improvements in low-MSA contexts. We anticipate that the proposed framework will advance our understanding of protein interactions, functions, and design. ProTact, an SE(3)-invariant geometric GNN, enhances protein-protein contact prediction and docking by integrating physics-informed constraints. It surpasses existing methods in low MSA scenarios and enhances AlphaFold3’s confidence scores.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: