Evaluates coseismic vertical offsets in the Messara Basin, indicating localized subsidence impacts.
Land subsidence and coseismic deformation can interact in groundwater-stressed sedimentary basins, yet basin-scale identification of event-timed vertical offsets in InSAR products requires explicit control of referencing and processing effects. This study evaluates whether the 27 September 2021 Arkalochori earthquake (Mw 6.0; central Crete) produced detectable coseismic vertical offsets within the Messara Basin by applying a reproducible screening workflow to Copernicus European Ground Motion Service (EGMS) Level-3 Vertical time series, from two processing generations (EGMS 2015–2021 and EGMS 2018–2022). An event-centered step metric (stepEQ), defined as the difference between post-event and pre-event mean displacements over a fixed acquisition window, is evaluated across three fixed spatial masks (MESSARA, R15060, R8750) together with a dispersion-based precision proxy (σstep) and a cross-generation sensitivity diagnostic (ΔstepEQ). A supplementary 2 + 2 subset sensitivity analysis indicates that the adopted fixed 3 + 3 estimator is stable at the basin scale, with sensitivity concentrated mainly in threshold-adjacent cases. Results indicate that Arkalochori-related offsets are not expressed as a basin-wide step across Messara; instead, non-background responses form a spatially limited and coherent subset concentrated where the basin intersects the near-source footprint. In EGMS 2018–2022, the higher vertical offset class (C2; |stepEQ| > 40 mm) is exclusively subsidence-direction and is enriched toward the screening center (up to ~19% within the radii mask R8750 m) but remains sparse at the basin scale mask (MESSARA mask) (~1%). Step-dominated points co-locate with strongly subsiding mean vertical velocity regimes and are hosted almost entirely by post-Alpine basin deposits, indicating strong material and background-deformation conditioning of step detectability. Cross-generation comparison shows basin-scale stability of background behavior but localized near-source sensitivity, supporting use of ΔstepEQ as a Quality Control (QC) lens for threshold-adjacent interpretations. The workflow provides a transparent, transferable approach for prioritizing candidate coseismic-step locations in EGMS time series. Results are interpreted as screening-level evidence in the derived vertical signal using event timing, spatial coherence, and QC diagnostics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michalakis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: