PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026Grass and Forage Science0 citationsOpen Access

Performance of Beef Cattle Under Grazing as Affected by Urochloa decumbens Cultivars

View Full Paper
GBG. J. BragaARAllan Kardec Braga RamosMCMarcelo Ayres Carvalho

Key Points

  • The research aimed to evaluate weight gain in young bulls grazing on varied Urochloa decumbens cultivars and measure the forage's nutritive quality.
  • Conducted over 2 years in clay soil using a randomized block design with three replicates.
  • Managed pastures under continuous stocking with variable stocking rates to maintain a specific canopy height.
  • Assessed live weight gain and forage quality among different cultivars.
  • Carinás cultivar led to the highest average daily gain at 0.62 kg LW.
  • Live weight gain per area showed Carinás reaching 406 kg LW/ha/year, outperforming Basilisk and Poraitê.
  • Crude protein content was higher in Carinás and Poraitê compared to Basilisk.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Testing animal performance under grazing is fundamental to determine the potential of recently released, high‐yielding Urochloa decumbens hybrids. The objective was to evaluate the weight gain of young bulls grazing on pastures of U. decumbens cultivars Basilisk, BRS Carinás, and BRS Poraitê, as well as to assess the nutritive value and plant‐part composition of the forage. The experiment was conducted over 2 years in a clay soil, using a randomized block design with three replicates. Pastures were managed under continuous stocking with a variable stocking rate (SR), aiming to maintain a canopy height of 25 cm. In contrast to the leaf blade and stem, the amount of dead material increased from the rainy to the early dry season, with Basilisk showing a greater mean value (1314 kg DM/ha), followed by Poraitê (1150 kg DM/ha) and Carinás (1127 kg DM/ha) ( p < 0.10). Carinás and Poraitê had slightly greater crude protein (CP) (114 g/kg) compared to Basilisk (105 g/kg), particularly during the first year. Animals grazing Carinás had greater average daily gain (ADG) (0.62 kg LW) compared to Poraitê (0.54 kg LW), and similar performance to Basilisk (0.59 kg LW). In terms of live weight gain per area (GA), Carinás outperformed the other cultivars, reaching 406 kg LW/ha/year, compared to 359 and 358 kg LW/ha/year for Basilisk and Poraitê, respectively, due to the greater ADG and the increased SR observed during the rainy season. Carinás and Poraitê have potential for promoting cattle growth, owing to their comparable forage quality and plant‐part composition to Basilisk. However, the superior live weight gain per area observed for Carinás demonstrates its greater carrying capacity, without compromising individual animal performance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Braga et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c336de0f0f753b39dd89https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.70052
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper