Maps wavelength-dependent outcomes of photocycloadditions in photopolymerizations, suggesting a novel method for controlling polymer properties.
[2 + 2] Photocycloadditions are one of the most important classes of photochemical reactions and are often employed in soft matter materials science. However, the wavelength resolved investigation of [2 + 2] based photopolymerizations has not been examined. Herein, we initially introduce a photoreactive alkene (nitrovinyl pyrene), which displays strong absorption in the visible light spectrum, extending to the green light (λ > 500 nm) region. Chromophore conversion and cycloaddition yield were quantified through a photochemical action plot using 1H NMR spectroscopy. A local maximum in the wavelength dependent quantum yield was observed close to 520 nm, revealing a strong mismatch between absorptivity and reactivity, i.e. higher values are observed at excitation wavelengths that are red-shifted relative to the absorption maximum. To ultimately map the wavelength dependence of a photopolymerization based on the introduced chromophore, we subsequently establish a size-exclusion chromatography (SEC)-based method to map the nitrovinyl pyrene species depletion as a function of wavelength, introducing an SEC-based photochemical action plot methodology. We next modify our chromophore with a second nitrovinyl group, making it a photoreactive bifunctional monomer, leading to a further redshift in its absorbance maximum and an increased quantum yield at 550 nm. We finally apply our SEC-based photochemical action plot methodology to map the wavelength-dependent [2 + 2] photopolymerization of the dinitrovinyl chromophore and demonstrate a significant effect of monochromatic wavelength on the product distribution of the individual chains, highlighting how changes in the electronic properties─particularly the size of the conjugated system─of multifunctional chromophore monomers can be exploited to control photopolymerizations via irradiation wavelength.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aireken et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: