This preprint develops a framework to understand phase response in superconducting circuits, indicating distinct thermal effects.
This preprint presents a conservative effective field theory (EFT) for superconducting circuits subject to spatially varying nonequilibrium thermal gradients. The manuscript develops a minimal gauge-invariant framework in which the superconducting phase, the electromagnetic gauge field, and a coarse-grained nonequilibrium control scalar are treated as low-energy degrees of freedom. Within this framework, the leading symmetry-allowed coupling between the control-field gradient and the gauge-invariant phase gradient is derived and shown to produce a modified Josephson response. The central result is a predicted phase offset in Josephson weak links and SQUID-type architectures, together with a characteristic phase-quadrature signature that is distinct from ordinary heating-induced critical-current suppression. In particular, the proposed response appears in the cosΔφ quadrature, whereas conventional thermal amplitude effects primarily enter through the sinΔφ channel. The manuscript includes: a minimal gauge-invariant EFT construction for superconducting circuits under nonequilibrium thermal gradients derivation of the modified Josephson current-phase relation with an induced phase offset consistency checks including the uniform-field limit, Ward identities, and stability/positivity bounds order-of-magnitude detectability estimates for SQUID and Josephson-array platforms experimental discrimination strategies, including lock-in detection, gradient reversal, and arm-exchange controls, to distinguish genuine phase offsets from asymmetric heating artifacts This work is intended as a conservative, testable low-energy theory for phase-coherent superconducting circuits, rather than as a microscopic reformulation of superconductivity. The thermal-control scalar used in the analysis is treated as a coarse-grained operational field, with σ=ln(T/T0) introduced only as a practical proxy for device-level estimates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ju Hyung Lee (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: