Examines how MGNREGA impacts income diversification in households, suggesting significant shifts in labor allocation.
Households diversify income through activities that differ in required input intensities. When a policy shock alters households’ available endowments, it can change the composition across these activities. While existing literature typically examines how changes in a single input, such as capital or labor, affect participation in a specific activity like entrepreneurship, this study considers the MGNREGA work-for-wage policy that simultaneously affects both credit access and labor availability. Such a policy is expected to shift households’ allocation between labor-intensive and capital-intensive activities. By relaxing credit constraints while reducing the labor availability for other income-smoothing pursuits, the policy is predicted to decrease engagement in labor-intensive microenterprises and increase participation in livestock ownership, a relatively capital-intensive activity. This theoretical prediction is consistent with the intuition of the Rybczynski theorem from international trade. Using IHDS data, the empirical analysis implementing a system of equations approach supports these expectations, with results remaining robust across alternative specifications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bidisha Lahiri (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: