Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative study examines authorial voice in multilingual adolescents, implying a need for inclusive curriculum development.
Recent research underscores the significance of developing a strong, sustained authorial voice in multilingual adolescent writers (Blackman in Int Edu J 16(4):1, 2017; Pasqua in English Australia 52(3): 31–35, 2017; as reported by Schepen (Kimmerle’s Intercultural Philosophy and Beyond: The Ongoing Quest for Epistemic Justice, Routledge, Abingdon, 2022); Strausz in Crit Stud Secur 10(3): 144–156, 2022). The unique experiences and cultural capital of multilingual high school students have the potential to enrich and transform teaching practices, moving to a more equitable and inclusive learning environment, where authorial voices of marginalised students come through strongly and freely in their writing (Blackman in Int Edu J 16(4):1, 2017; Little in English Australia 57(1):15–27, 2022). However, research on authorial voice in the writing of adolescents, especially multilingual high school students, is scarce. This paper aims to bridge this gap and reports on intermediate findings from a longitudinal qualitative study, examining multilingual adolescents’ voice in academic writing, as they transition from a High School Preparation intensive English program to high schools in Australia. More specifically, the paper presents a contextual analysis of the student-composed texts, exploring the participants’ perspectives on authorial voice in academic writing. Findings from semi-structured interviews with the students and their teachers have important implications for curriculum design and teaching in Australian high school writing classrooms with the increasingly diverse student populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olga Mhilli (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: