Key result
Both 8-mm and 6-mm cryoablation catheters yield excellent success and comparable recurrence in pediatric AVNRT.
Why the study?
Limited data are available comparing 6- and 8-mm cryocatheter tips for AVNRT in large pediatric cohorts.
Does an 8-mm cryoablation catheter improve acute success and reduce recurrence compared to a 6-mm catheter in pediatric patients with AVNRT?
Does an 8-mm cryoablation catheter improve acute success and reduce recurrence compared to a 6-mm catheter in pediatric patients with AVNRT?
Both 6-mm and 8-mm cryoablation catheters are safe and effective for pediatric AVNRT, with the 8-mm catheter showing comparable acute success and a non-significant trend toward fewer recurrences despite use in more complex cases.
Supports 8-mm cryoablation in complex pediatric AVNRT; hypothesis-generating for lower recurrence versus 6-mm catheters.
Background Cryoablation is commonly used for pediatric atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) due to its excellent safety profile and nearly zero risk of permanent atrioventricular (AV) block. However, limited data comparing 6‐ and 8‐mm cryocatheter tips in large pediatric cohorts are available. This study aims to evaluate and compare the procedural characteristics, acute success, and long‐term outcomes of 6‐ and 8‐mm cryoablation catheters in children undergoing slow pathway modification for AVNRT. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 343 pediatric patients (≤18 years) who underwent cryoablation for AVNRT between 2016 and 2025. Patients were treated with either a 6‐mm ( n = 182) or an 8‐mm ( n = 161) cryocatheter. Baseline characteristics, electrophysiological parameters, procedural metrics, complications, and recurrence outcomes were analyzed. All procedures used three‐dimensional electroanatomical mapping to improve anatomical accuracy and reduce fluoroscopy exposure. Results Patients in the 8‐mm group were older and heavier and had a higher rate of prior ablation (21.1% vs. 6.0%), indicating greater procedural complexity. Procedure duration, total cryotherapy time, and the number of lesions were significantly longer in the 8‐mm group. Acute success rates were excellent in both groups (99.5% vs. 100%), and there were no cases of permanent AV block, pericardial effusion, or major complications. Over a median follow‐up of 69 months in the 6‐mm group and 30 months in the 8‐mm group, recurrence rates were 15.4% and 10.6%, respectively ( p = 0.246), showing a favorable but non‐significant trend toward fewer recurrences with the 8‐mm catheter. Conclusion Both 6‐ and 8‐mm cryoablation catheters offer highly safe and effective treatment for pediatric AVNRT. Despite being used in more complex cases, the 8‐mm catheter achieved comparable acute results and showed a potential long‐term benefit, supporting its use in selected patient groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karadeniz et al. (2026) studied this question. Both 6-mm and 8-mm cryoablation catheters achieved excellent acute success (99.5% vs 100%) and safety for pediatric AVNRT, with comparable recurrence rates of 15.4% and 10.6% (p=0.246).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: