Key result
gPDGFR screening achieves 100% sensitivity for detecting PDGFR rearrangements in patients with hypereosinophilia.
Why the study?
Detection of myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with tyrosine kinase rearrangements remains challenging, particularly for cryptic PDGFRA rearrangements.
Does the gPDGFR assay accurately detect PDGFR rearrangements in patients with hypereosinophilia?
Does the gPDGFR assay accurately detect PDGFR rearrangements in patients with hypereosinophilia?
The gPDGFR assay is a highly sensitive, partner-independent first-line screening tool for detecting PDGFR rearrangements in patients with hypereosinophilia.
Supports gPDGFR as first-line screen in hypereosinophilia to guide TKI decisions; extends real-world evidence for partner-independent detection.
Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with tyrosine kinase rearrangements (MLN-TKs) are rare clonal eosinophilias driven by PDGFRA, PDGFRB and other kinase fusions, highly sensitive to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Their detection remains challenging, particularly for cryptic PDGFRA rearrangements. We performed a large multicenter real-world validation of the generic quantitative RT-PCR assay (gPDGFR), which detects 3′ PDGFRA/PDGFRB overexpression independently of fusion partner. A total of 231 consecutive patients with hypereosinophilia from 12 French centers were analyzed, and assay robustness was further assessed in an independent heterogeneous cohort of 102 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-treated patients. Twenty-two PDGFR-rearranged cases (14 PDGFRA-r, 8 PDGFRB-r) were identified. The assay demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 100% negative predictive value. For PDGFRA, positive predictive value and specificity reached 100%. In contrast, PDGFRB overexpression showed lower specificity due to borderline false-positive cases, underscoring the need for confirmatory testing. In selected patients, longitudinal gPDGFR kinetics paralleled fusion-specific RT-qPCR, supporting its use for molecular follow-up when dedicated assays are unavailable, although it does not provide quantitative measurable residual disease assessment. Overall, gPDGFR represents a robust, partner-independent first-line screening strategy that can be readily integrated into routine diagnostic workflows to enable timely identification of patients eligible for targeted therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lanneretonne et al. (2026) studied this question. The gPDGFR screening assay demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 100% negative predictive value for detecting PDGFR rearrangements in a real-world cohort of patients with hypereosinophilia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: