PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026Diagnostics0 citationsOpen Access

Externally Validated Deep Learning Analysis of Chest Radiographs for Differentiating COVID-19 and Viral Pneumonia

View Full Paper
MMMichael MasoomiLALatifa Al-KandariHRHaytam Ramzy

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop and validate a deep learning model for classifying chest radiographs as normal, COVID-19, or viral pneumonia.
  • Developed a ResNet-50 architecture for image classification.
  • Conducted model training and validation using publicly available chest radiograph datasets.
  • Used patient-level stratified five-fold cross-validation for internal validation.
  • Evaluated generalizability on an external institutional dataset from Adan Hospital, Kuwait.
  • Achieved an overall accuracy of 96.8% on the public validation dataset of 847 images.
  • Accuracy dropped to 93.7% on the external dataset of 320 images, highlighting the impact of domain shift.
  • High negative predictive values for normal and COVID-19 classes were maintained across datasets.

Abstract

Background/Objective: Chest radiography (CXR) is routinely used in the evaluation of respiratory disease; however, differentiating COVID-19 from other viral pneumonias on CXR remains challenging due to substantial radiographic overlap. In this study, a deep learning-based CXR classification model using a ResNet-50 architecture was developed to categorize images as normal, COVID-19, or non-COVID viral pneumonia, with emphasis on bias mitigation and external validation. Methods: Model training and internal validation were performed using harmonized publicly available datasets with patient-level stratified five-fold cross-validation, while generalizability was evaluated using an independent real-world institutional dataset from Adan Hospital, Kuwait, which was excluded from all training, validation, and hyperparameter tuning stages. Results: On the public validation dataset (n = 847), the model achieved an overall accuracy of 96.8% with balanced class-wise performance, whereas performance on the independent institutional dataset (n = 320) decreased to 93.7%, consistent with expected domain shift. Calibration analyses demonstrated well-aligned probabilistic estimates on validation data and acceptable calibration on institutional data. Negative predictive values remained high for normal and COVID-19 classes across datasets. Exploratory decision curve analysis demonstrated net benefit patterns for COVID-19 predictions under hypothetical threshold assumptions. Conclusions: These findings indicate that, when developed with explicit bias-mitigation strategies and evaluated using independent institutional data, deep learning-based CXR analysis may provide supportive, non-diagnostic decision signals for radiology triage workflows; however, prospective multicenter validation is required prior to clinical adoption.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Masoomi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c3cede0f0f753b39ee42https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16070995
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper