December 8, 2018Open Access

Evaluating the performance of a deep learning‐based computer‐aided diagnosis (DL‐CAD) system for detecting and characterizing lung nodules: Comparison with the performance of double reading by radiologists

Puntos clave

Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.

Resumen

Our DL-CAD system detected significantly more nodules than double reading. In the future, false positive findings should be further reduced and characterization accuracy improved.

Leer artículo completoexternamente

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo

Cite This Study

Li et al. (Sat,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c9474fa128171327a2e1bc https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12931

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1A review of lung cancer screening and the role of computer-aided detection2017 · 128 citations
2Persistent Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Lung Nodules ≥ 10 mm in Diameter at CT Scan2013 · 257 citations
3Pearson's correlation coefficient2012 · 991 citations
4Automatic detection of pulmonary nodules at spiral CT: clinical application of a computer-aided diagnosis system2001 · 137 citations
5Screening for Lung Cancer with Low-Dose Spiral Computed Tomography2002 · 687 citations

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo