Observer variability for Lung-RADS categorisation of lung cancer screening CTs: impact on patient management

Sarah J. van Riel; Colin Jacobs; Ernst T. Scholten; Rianne Wittenberg; Mathilde Marie Winkler Wille; Bartjan de Hoop; Ralf W. Sprengers; Onno M. Mets; Bram Geurts; Mathias Prokop; Cornelia Schaefer‐Prokop; Bram van Ginneken

doi:10.1007/s00330-018-5599-4

July 31, 2018European RadiologyOpen Access

Observer variability for Lung-RADS categorisation of lung cancer screening CTs: impact on patient management

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.

• Lung-RADS categorisation of low-dose lung screening CTs achieved substantial interobserver agreement. • Major cause for disagreement was assigning a different nodule as risk-dominant. • Disagreement led to a different follow-up time in 8% of reading pairs.

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Riel et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c9474fa128171327a2e1bd https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5599-4

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Observer variability for Lung-RADS categorisation of lung cancer screening CTs: impact on patient management

Abstract

Ask about this paper

Discussion

Cite This Study

Observer variability for Lung-RADS categorisation of lung cancer screening CTs: impact on patient management

Abstract

Ask about this paper

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading