PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 30, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Statistical Analysis of the Cerro Macareno Tablet: Non-Random Structure, Spatial Gradients, and Astronomical Exploration

View Full Paper
SGSergio Pablo Beret Grande

Key Points

  • The research aims to analyze the structure and potential astronomical significance of the Cerro Macareno Tablet.
  • Conducted discriminant analysis and modern spatial statistics to examine tablet structure.
  • Applied spectral methods and a structured-null permutation test for astronomical hypotheses.
  • Used Fisher’s exact test to assess mark placement patterns and runs tests for sequential independence.
  • Confirmed pronounced left-to-right gradient with Fisher’s exact test (OR = 7.58, p = 7.0 × 10−6).
  • Identified strong non-random spatial structure but found no unique support for Venus as a periodic explanation.
  • Ranked Venus lower compared to other periodic models in specificity analysis, with no significant advantage.

Abstract

We present a quantitative analysis of the Cerro Macareno Tablet, a fired-clay artefact (8 rows × 14 columns = 112 cells) housed at the Museo Arqueológico de Sevilla. Previous work by Sáez Uribarri (2006) demonstrated non-randomness using discriminant analysis. We extend that baseline with modern spatial statistics, spectral methods, and astronomical hypothesis testing. Our central finding is strong evidence against uniform or independent mark placement: Fisher’s exact test yields OR = 7.58 (p = 7.0 × 10−6), confirming a pronounced left-to-right gradient, and runs tests reject sequential independence across three distinct linearisations. A spectral peak at period T = 14 cells is noted but cannot be attributed to temporal periodicity independently of the columnar gradient. Regarding astronomical hypotheses, a structured-null permutation test (fixed-margin, 9,999 replications) detects a residual structured association between a Venus elongation model and the tablet beyond the row-plus-column baseline (p = 0.034). However, a leave-one-row-out specificity analysis comparing Venus against eight pseudo-periodic families plus a jittered Venus control shows that Venus performs worse than all substantive periodic controls, ranking 9th out of 10 families tested (Venus+jitter ranks last), with no significant advantage over the best control (pbootstrap = 0.38; descriptive bootstrap only). We conclude that the tablet exhibits robust non-random spatial structure, but the data do not identify Venus as the unique or best-supported periodic astronomical explanation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sergio Pablo Beret Grande (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c9c51bf8fdd13afe0bd1f7https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19285306
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Statistical Analysis of the Cerro Macareno Tablet: Non-Random Structure, Spatial Gradients, and Astronomical Exploration2026
  2. 2THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE TEMPLE OF THE INSCRIPTIONS AND THE GLYPHIC CORPUS OF THE CENTRAL TABLET: A HYPOTHESIS OF STRUCTURAL CORRESPONDENCE2026
  3. 3Statistical Analysis of Ancient Monumental Site Distribution Along a Proposed Great Circle: Evidence from Five Archaeological Databases and a Hemisphere Decomposition2026
  4. 4Non-Random Bearing Distributions and Celestial Convergence Lines in Global Ancient Monument Placement: A Computational Analysis of 802 Archaeological Sites2026
  5. 5Non-Random Bearing Distributions and Celestial Convergence Lines in Global Ancient Monument Placement: A Computational Analysis of 828 Archaeological Sites2026