The findings demonstrate the QCD correction in the PDL mass ratio formula, suggesting implications for gravitational constant calculations.
The ε_G conjecture of D28 expressed Newton's gravitational constant as G = (ħc/m_p²)·(ε_G^B)^18, with ε_G^B ∈ ℚ(√5) accurate to 17 ppm, contingent on proving two steps: (a) that 155/11017 follows from the PDL axioms (resolved in D29), and (b) that the coefficient 2 in the isospin correction 2Δm_iso/m_p is a structural consequence of the PDL axioms rather than a numerical fit. This paper resolves step (b) and thereby proves the ε_G conjecture under the minimal PDL–QCD interface, closing Gate 2. The central result is Lemma 2: the PDL engagement coefficient a = 2 is forced by charge constraint C4 applied to the proton quintuplet, because only mixed triangles of type (1 up-core, 2 down-cores) satisfy the (A)∧(B) stability criterion with net charge +1. The identification Δm_iso = m_d − m_u is forced uniquely by PDL charge constraint C1, making it the minimum irreducible external parameter at the PDL–QCD interface. Under this minimal identification, the full factorisation δμ = (155/11017)·(1 − 2Δm_iso/m_p) + O(47 ppm) follows from PDL axioms together with Δm_iso, and the conjecture ε_G = ε_G^B ∈ ℚ(√5) is proved to 17 ppm. As a consequence, Newton's gravitational constant G = (ħc/m_p²)·(ε_G^B)^18 is a fully combinatorial prediction from the proton quintuplet (24, 28, 930, 10087, 11017), with Δm_iso as the sole irreducible external input.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cédric Laubscher (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: