Political philosophy explores Taiwan independence in light of colonization, suggesting a unique collective identity.
The philosopher Joshua Wen‐kwei Liao is known as a founding theorist of the Taiwan independence movement. My aim is to engage with his Formosa Speaks (1950) as a primary text of postcolonial political philosophy, and trace its influence on the ongoing Taiwan independence movement. I start with two of its lessons that have resonated: (1) the international legal status of Taiwan remains undetermined; and (2) a distinctive Taiwan identity has been formed by a history of colonization. I then turn to three of its lessons that have not, at least not fully: (3) Taiwan independence need not be racialist; (4) Taiwan independence need not be merely a remedial response; and (5) Taiwan independence need not go by the official name of “Taiwan”.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen‐yi Liao (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: