Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational framework uncovers geometric versus structural rotation in General Relativity, indicating new diagnostic methods.
This preprint presents Structural Rotation Test (SRT) v2.3, a minimal and falsifiable observational framework designed to distinguish between geometric rotation in General Relativity and structural rotation in Structural Differentiation Gravity (SDG). Rather than treating rotational gravity solely as a consequence of spacetime geometry, SRT examines whether rotational phenomena can be interpreted as observable manifestations of structural differentiation within a closed relational system. The framework introduces a direct comparison between SDG-based rotational predictions and standard GR-based expectations using residual structure, fitting behavior, and decision-level observational criteria. Version 2.3 focuses on the observational discriminability of the two frameworks. It provides a compact decision structure, illustrative fitting comparisons, and residual-based diagnostics that clarify how future observations may separate geometric and structural interpretations of rotation. This upload includes the full preprint PDF, the figure-generation Python script, and all figures used in the manuscript.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koji Okino (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: