Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This framework improves yield characterization of nuclear explosions by fusing data from multiple sensors, indicating the potential to enhance monitoring accuracy.
Summary We develop and demonstrate a new paradigm for modeling prompt forensics data from potential nuclear explosions of concern. Related scenarios include nuclear terrorism, which may involve low-yield detonations. Traditional modeling appropriate for higher-yield historical nuclear testing is generalized to capture uncertainties in yields (such as when using conversion to obtain “equivalent” nuclear yields for conventional explosives in low-yield experiments) and to capture variation among source-to-sensor path effects for which no calibration data are available. Special attention is paid to quantifying these sources of uncertainty and to their formal inclusion in comprehensive yield uncertainty — uncertainty that would otherwise be underestimated and potentially lead to mistaken conclusions. For the example scenario considered, two useful stand-alone monitoring phenomenologies are based on geophysical data (from surface effects characteristics and local seismic metrics). By fusing signatures from multiple phenomenologies, the Multi-Phenomenology Explosion Monitoring (MultiPEM) framework provides improved yield characterization relative to reliance on single-phenomenology analysis alone, especially when individual sensors have complementary sensitivities to emplacement/environmental conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Williams et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: