This model demonstrates effective indicators in architecture education, suggesting improved industry collaboration in curricula.
This paper presents a professional competence indicator system for undergraduate architecture students.Grounded in national policy documents, theories and international frameworks, the system covers five dimensions with 51 indicators.Policy-text analysis, principal-component analysis and online recruitment data mining were integrated, with indicator weights assigned through a weighted-coefficient method and dynamically updated.A 'graduate-employer' dual-evaluation model and a curriculum-reform pilot were introduced to verify feasibility and effectiveness.The system offers an operational instrument and reference framework for optimising architecture-talent cultivation programmes and consolidating industry-education symbiosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: