PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 30, 20260 citations

Indicators of poor prognosis of acute pericarditis

View Full Paper
IMImazio MCECecchi EDBDemichelis B

Key Points

  • The study assesses the relationship between clinical features and prognosis in acute pericarditis.
  • Evaluated 453 patients aged 17 to 90 years with acute pericarditis.
  • Excluded post-myocardial infarction cases.
  • Conducted multivariable analysis to identify risk indicators.
  • Specific causes found in 76 patients (16.8%), including autoimmune (7.3%) and neoplastic (5.1%).
  • Complications detected in 95 patients (21.0%): 83 recurrences, 14 tamponade, and 7 constriction.
  • Increased risk associated with fever >38°C, large effusion, and failed aspirin or NSAID treatment.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical search for indicators of poor prognosis of acute pericarditis may be useful for clinical triage of patients at high risk of specific causal conditions or complications. The aim of the present article is to assess the relationship between clinical features at presentation and specific causes or complications. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 453 patients aged 17 to 90 years (mean age 52+/-18 years, 245 men) with acute pericarditis (post-myocardial infarction pericarditis was excluded) were prospectively evaluated from January 1996 to August 2004. A specific cause was found in 76 of 453 patients (16.8%): autoimmune in 33 patients (7.3%), neoplastic in 23 patients (5.1%), tuberculous in 17 patients (3.8%), and purulent in 3 patients (0.7%). In multivariable analysis, women (hazard ratio HR 1.67, 95% confidence interval CI 1.03 to 2.70; P=0.036) and patients with fever >38 degrees C (HR 3.56, 95% CI 1.82 to 6.95; P38 degrees C, subacute course, large effusion or tamponade, and aspirin or NSAID failure) may be useful to identify higher risk of specific causal conditions and complications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

M et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c9c5c5f8fdd13afe0bdccchttps://doi.org/10.1161/circulationha.106.662114
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper